The String Quartet no. 1 in C major, opus 49, was not the first work that Shostakovich had written for this group of instruments. In the night of the 31 October to the 1 November 1931, while staying in Batumi, Georgia, on the Black Sea, he had dashed off two pieces which he dedicated to the Jean Vuillaume Quartet1. But they were not original works, rather they were transcriptions of other pieces. One came from his successful opera 'Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District', his opus 29 which he was composing at the time. The opera contains some beautiful music, some of which Shostakovich would quote in later quartets. But in Batumi Shostakovich transcribed just the heroine's, Katerina’s, aria 'The foal runs after the filly' from Act 1, Scene 3. The second transcription was the polka from his ballet 'The Golden Age', opus 222.
He had also written twelve preludes for quartet for the film 'Girlfriends' between 1934 and 19353 but on the 30 May 1938 in Leningrad, he began his first original string quartet. The piece has a duration of about 15 minutes and is in four movements, marked:
- Moderato,
- Moderato,
- Allegro molto,
- Allegro,
Shostakovich was now almost thirty-two, fairly late for his first adventure in this genre considering how prolific he had been in his youth and how many string quartets he would compose in the rest of his life. He wrote4:
I began to write it without special ideas and feeling, I thought that nothing would come of it. After all, the quartet is one of the most difficult musical genres. I wrote the first page as a sort of original exercise in the quartet form, not thinking about subsequently completing and releasing it. As a rule, I fairly often write things I don’t publish. They are my type of composer’s studies. But then work on the quartet captivated me and I finished it rather quickly.
The composition did make rapid progress for he completed it in Leningrad on the 17 July. Realising that it might be compared with his previous work, the monumental Fifth Symphony, he noted5:
Don’t expect to find special depth in this, my first quartet opus. In mood it is joyful, merry, lyrical. I would call it 'spring-like'.
The depths which Beethoven explored remain undisturbed in Russian string quartets; they tend to be more relaxed and lack the cerebral intensity so apparent in their Germanic cousins. Moreover 19th-century Russian music was generally a more dilettante affair. Even at the end of this period, when the group of composers known either as 'the Five' or 'Kuchka' (Balakirev, Cui, Mussorgsky, Rimsky-Korsakov and Borodin) were composing, it was only Balakirev who did not have a 'real' job. This amateur tradition affected the way Russian musical was perceived. Gerald Abraham writes that6,
...the view of (Russian) chamber music as a relatively light weight medium has persisted right down to the string quartets of Shostakovich.
And Shostakovich in his first string quartet was not to challenge this assessment, for it contains the same romantic nostalgia, the same yearning after the idyllic, that can be heard in Borodin's second quartet (whilst, mercifully, escaping the latter's fate of becoming part of Kismet).
In this quartet we find none of the spiky dissonance of the earlier Shostakovich - the Russian "enfant terrible". Absent too are those passages which push the instruments to their limits and even, for some listeners, beyond them. This quartet is the untroubled work of a soul at rest with itself: a composition of contentment. But it is just this ease, just this lack of strain, which is so remarkable, because it followed a traumatic event in Shostakovich's life which started on the evening of 26 January 1936. What happened then was to change his life and his style of composing. Because the First Quartet, indeed the whole cycle of quartets can only be fully understood in the light of that event, a brief description of what happened is necessary.
Until January 1936 things had gone very well for Shostakovich. He had rocketed to fame with his first symphony at the age of nineteen and had rapidly produced two further symphonies, two operas and music for the ballet. His second opera 'Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District' was biting, sordid and trenchant, full of the elements of musical modernism: it was also a great success. By the beginning of 1936 it had been running for two years in both Leningrad, where it had been performed 83 times, and in Moscow, where it had had 97 performances. It had also been performed in New York, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Buenos Aires, Zürich, Prague, Bratislava and Stockholm.
But on 26 January 1936 Shostakovich's luck changed7. That evening Stalin, Molotov, Mikoyan and Zhdanov attended a performance of 'Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District' at the Bolshoi in Moscow. They left abruptly and ominously at the end of the penultimate act, thereby not joining in with the applause that greeted the final curtain. On the 28 January Shostakovich, then in Archangel on a concert tour with the cellist Victor Lvovich Kubatsky, picked up a copy of Pravda at the railway station and read on the third page a critical article about his opera. This 'ghost-written' report, entitled 'Muddle instead of music', bitterly condemned his opera in the most ferocious of terms8:
On the stage singing is replace by screaming.
The composer of the 'Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District' had to use the nervous, cramped, epileptic
music of jazz to give his heroine 'passion'.
Everything is gross, primitive and vulgar.
The composer has obviously not set himself the task of satisfying the musical expectations of the Soviet
opera-goer.
[Shostakovich] has ignored the requirement of Soviet culture to banish …
etc., etc., etc.....
But this was just the beginning. On the 6th February, a week later, a second article was to appear in Pravda, again unsigned, this time attacking Shostakovich’s ballet 'The Limpid Stream'9. The editorial entitled 'Balletic Falsity' condemned the work as being undemanding and out of touch with the Soviet rural life which it pertained to reflect. Who wrote the articles has never been fully resolved, but as Pravda was the official party newspaper, founded in St. Petersburg by the Bolsheviks in 1912 - five years before the revolution, it could be assumed that they must have had the tacit approval of Stalin10, who had long assumed power over the Politburo in the Soviet Union.
Shostakovich had become a pawn in a political battle about Socialist Realism11 in the Soviet life and the evil of artistic 'formalism'. The danger was that pawns are easily sacrificed for the benefit of the wider game. The best policy for Shostakovich and all the other minor pieces that found themselves on this chess board was to head for cover. The performances of both works, the opera and the ballet, were immediately cancelled and Shostakovich retreated into himself, making no effort to publicly defend himself. Instead he worked on his Fourth Symphony in C minor, opus 43, which, according to a letter he wrote to Victor Kubatsky, he completed on the 26 April12. The symphony was due to have been performed on the 11 December 1936 in Leningrad but at the very last minute it was withdrawn. A brief announcement appeared in 'Sovetskoye iskusstov' on that day.
Composer Shostakovich appealed to the Leningrad Philharmonic with the request to withdraw his Fourth Symphony from performance on the grounds that it in no way corresponds to his current creative convictions and represents for him a long outdated phase.13
Clearly Shostakovich had been warned, whether by friends or colleagues remains obscure, that elements of 'formalism' might be detected in the work. So the symphony was withdrawn at the very last moment and Shostakovich began work on another, his Fifth in D minor.
On the 21 November 1937 this new symphony, opus 47, 'a Soviet artist’s practical creative reply to justified criticism' - was performed in Leningrad as part of the celebration of the twentieth anniversary of the October Revolution. This tragic-heroic symphony with its reappearing motifs; its Mahler-like second movement; the musical references in the third movement to the Pannikhida, the Russian Orthodox prayer for the dead; and the idea of 'rebirth' suggested in the final movement by quoting his own song of a Pushkin poem, aroused deep emotions on its first performance. People wept openly and when the conductor, Yevgeni Mravinsky, lowered his baton the audience rose and gave a standing ovation. Shostakovich seemed to have answered his critics. But in truth the performance had been approved already by the Party. They had heard the symphony earlier in the autumn when it was performed on two pianos by Nikita Bogoslovsky and Dmitri Shostakovich himself.
Certainly the music of the Fifth Symphony was unlike any other that he had written. And if it quoted Pushkin, Mahler and the Pannikhida, then the 'rebirth' it foretold was an acceptance of musical tradition and a suspension of the influences of Dada and Meyerhold’s theatre. The First String Quartet, distinctly more private compared to the intensely public Fifth Symphony, nevertheless echoes this rebirth, this change of direction. Perhaps this is the reason why Shostakovich called it 'spring-like'.
The first movement, marked moderato and opening in the prosaic key of C major, is uncomplicated even wistful and is in the form of a sonata. Throughout just a single voice is heard with the other instruments providing the accompaniment until all four fade away, morendo. In the second movement, again marked moderato but this time in A minor, the viola introduces an element so typical of much of Shostakovich’s music, a simple folk-like tune. This undergoes seven variations before the movement is concluded with a recapitulation. It is only in the third movement, in C sharp minor and marked allegro molto, that any sense of impish mischief arises but galaxies separate it from the squalid criminality of the Mtsensk District and even this whiff of devilry is soon forgotten in the sobriety and comfort of the final movement.
This finale in C major is basically a sonata in form but is shorter than the first movement and more complex. It also displays augmentation and metrical techniques that Shostakovich would use in his later quartets. However the resolution is problematic because, having regained the tonic at the end of the development phase, it is lost during the recapitulation. Only at the very end of the coda is resolution finally achieved with the movement ending triumphantly on C major.
This quartet with its four movements, a sonata in C followed by a slow movement and then a scherzo, and concluding with another sonata also in C, is classical in form. As such it is an easy introduction to the remaining quartets, although not typical of them. Like Prokofiev's first symphony, 'the Classical', it is a piece of exquisite perfection. Emotional depth will come in later works. For me Shostakovich's First Quartet is reminiscent of those sugary, alabaster busts of Mozart so often seen in the living-rooms of my childhood which made me suspicious, until I heard the G-minor quintet, of Mozart's depth.14
On the 27 July 1938 Shostakovich wrote a letter to Ivan Ivanovich Sollertinsky a historian and critic of the performing arts and literature and a leading figure in the cultural life of Leningrad. Sollertinsky was Shostakovich’s closest confident from 1927 until his death in 1944. In his letter he wrote15:
I have also completed my quartet, the beginning of which I played to you. In the process of composition I regrouped in mid-stream. The first movement became the last, the last first. Four movements in all. It didn’t turn out particularly well. But, you know, it’s hard to compose well. One has to know how.
The statement about reorganising is interesting. With the two outer movements reversed the quartet gives a different, less optimistic impression. It would have then started with the confident Allegro and gradually become less up-beat only to end morendo. What caused Shostakovich to change the order of the movements remains unknown. It could have been for artistic reasons or because he felt the more uplifting ending was better suited for an era of 'Socialist Realism'16.
Although the simplicity of the C major key is appropriate for the mood of the quartet, it is tempting, retrospectively, to read more into the choice. His other great cycles, the 24 Preludes, opus. 34, and the 24 Preludes and Fugues, opus 87, both start with an innocent-sounding composition in C major and then using this unadorned root branch off into the complexities of other tonalities. But it seems unlikely that Shostakovich planned at this stage a cycle of quartets. Indeed the first quartet is separated from the second by six years, so it would appear that, at this stage, Shostakovich had not yet developed the affinity for the genre which was to become so obvious in his later years.
The quartet was premièred in Leningrad on the 10 October 1938 by the Glazunov Quartet. The original manuscript is lost but there is an autographed piano score in which the positions of the first and fourth movements are substituted at the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art (RGALI). Unlike those early transcriptions for the Jean Vuillaume Quartet in 1931 this first quartet bears no dedication.