the 'rebirth' of a composer
January 1936 was the pivotal month in Shostakovich's music: it was the moment which altered the nature of all his compositions. It changed his life. All of his works are recognisable as having been written before or after the events of that month.
We will never know what music he might have composed had the Lady Macbeth affair not happened. Did it thwart his genius? or did the events of that month produce the pressure required for diamonds of brilliance?
Until January 1936 things had gone very well for Shostakovich. He had rocketed to fame with his first symphony at the age of nineteen and had rapidly produced two further symphonies, two operas and music for the ballet. His second opera 'Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District' marked a change in style. Until then his works for the musical stage had been iconoclastic and clownishly grotesque. The Bolt - an 'industrial' ballet; the Golden Age - a ballet about a football team and the Nose - an opera about a severed nose, were all in the style of the Russian master of the grotesque, Gogol, although only the last was based explicitly on a work by him. But with Lady Macbeth Shostakovich reverted to a more traditional Russian theme - the tragic. It was biting, sordid and trenchant and full of the elements of musical modernism but it was also a great success.
The opera was based on Nikolai Leskov's novella 'Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District' published in 1865. Lady Macbeth is Katerina Lvovna Izmailova, the bored and sexually frustrated wife of Zinovy Borisovich Izmailov the son of a wealthy merchant Boris Timofeevich. She begins an affair with Sergei, an employee of her father-in-law, which leads to her murdering four people: her father-in-law Boris Timofeevich (with rat poison); her husband Zinovy Borisovich (with a candlestick); Zinovy's young nephew Fedya Lyamin (suffocated with a pillow) and Sergei's prison mistress Sonetka (whom she drowns along with herself). The administrative district of Mtsensk lies south-southwest of Moscow, halfway to the boarder with the Ukraine. The book's title is meant ironically – such a brutal person in such a nondescript place.
However Shostakovich makes Katerina more attractive than in Leskov's original tale. In the opera Boris becomes more repellent; the infanticide is omitted1; Katerina shows repentance and her final death looks more an act of self-punishment than of revenge. These alterations do not change her into a Cordelia, a Desdemona or an Ophelia (Katerina is not the victim of another's insanity: that of Lear, Othello or Hamlet) rather Shostakovich displays Katerina as a victim of the society in which she lived.
By the beginning of 1936 the opera had been running for two years in both Leningrad, where it had been performed 83 times, and in Moscow, where it had had 97 performances. It had also been performed in New York, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Buenos Aires, Zürich, Prague, Bratislava and Stockholm2. But on 26 January 1936 Shostakovich's luck changed. That evening Stalin3, Molotov, Mikoyan and Zhdanov attended a performance of 'Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District' at the Bolshoi in Moscow. They left abruptly and ominously at the end of the penultimate act, thereby not joining in with the applause that greeted the final curtain. On the 28 January Shostakovich, then in Archangel on a concert tour with the cellist Victor Lvovich Kubatsky, picked up a copy of Pravda at the railway station and read on the third page a critical article about his opera. This 'ghost-written' report, entitled 'Muddle instead of music', bitterly condemned his opera in the most ferocious of terms4:
On the stage singing is replace by screaming.
The composer of the 'Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District' had to use the nervous, cramped, epileptic
music of jazz to give his heroine 'passion'.
Everything is gross, primitive and vulgar.
The composer has obviously not set himself the task of satisfying the musical expectations of the Soviet
opera-goer.
[Shostakovich] has ignored the requirement of Soviet culture to banish …
etc., etc., etc.....
But this was just the beginning. On the 6th February, a week later, a second article was to appear in Pravda, again unsigned, this time attacking Shostakovich’s ballet 'The Limpid Stream'5. The editorial entitled 'Balletic Falsity' condemned the work as being undemanding and out of touch with the Soviet rural life which it pretended to reflect. Who wrote the articles has never been fully resolved6, but as Pravda was the official party newspaper, founded in St. Petersburg (Leningrad) by the Bolsheviks in 1912 - five years before the revolution, it could be assumed that they must have had the tacit approval of Stalin, who had now long assumed power over the Politburo in the Soviet Union.
Shostakovich had become a pawn in a political battle about Socialist Realism7 in Soviet Russia and the evil of artistic 'formalism'. He was also an isolated pawn - standing there alone, deserted by almost all of his friends and in imminent danger of being existentially sacrificed. The best policy for Shostakovich and all the other insignificant pawns that found themselves on this chess board was to head for cover. The performances of both works, the opera and the ballet, were immediately cancelled and Shostakovich retreated into himself, making no effort at any public defence. Instead he worked on his Fourth Symphony in C minor, opus 43, which, according to a letter he wrote to Victor Kubatsky, he completed on the 26 April8. The symphony was due to have been performed on the 11 December 1936 in Leningrad but at the very last minute it was withdrawn. A brief announcement appeared in 'Sovetskoye iskusstov' on that day.
Composer Shostakovich appealed to the Leningrad Philharmonic with the request to withdraw his Fourth Symphony from performance on the grounds that it in no way corresponds to his current creative convictions and represents for him a long outdated phase.9
Clearly Shostakovich had been warned, whether by friends or colleagues remains obscure, that elements of 'formalism' might be detected in the work. So the symphony was withdrawn at the very last moment and Shostakovich began work on another, his Fifth in D minor.
On the 21 November 1937 this new symphony - his Fifth, opus 47, 'a Soviet artist’s practical creative reply to justified criticism' - was performed in Leningrad as part of the celebration of the twentieth anniversary of the October Revolution. This tragic-heroic symphony with its reappearing motifs; its Mahler-like second movement; the musical references in the third movement to the Pannikhida, the Russian Orthodox prayer for the dead; and the idea of 'rebirth' suggested in the final movement by quoting his own song of a Pushkin poem, aroused deep emotions on its first performance. People wept openly and when the conductor, Yevgeni Mravinsky, lowered his baton the audience rose and gave a standing ovation. Shostakovich had composed a masterpiece of Socialist Realism art but the ruling élite already knew that. The symphony had been approved by them earlier that autumn when Nikita Bogoslovsky and Dmitri Shostakovich performed it for them on two pianos.
Certainly the music of the Fifth Symphony was unlike any other that he had written. It the cast aside the influences of the grotesque, of Dadaism and of Meyerhold’s theatre. Instead it is Beethovian; there is a sense of the indefatigable. It contained no whiff of 'Formalism'. Based on classical tradition it appeared to conform to the doctrine of socialist realism.
But if his public works had become more in line with the dogma of the time, his private compositions like the string quartets, which he began to write after the Lady Macbeth Affair, became increasingly introspective. They started with the innocent First String Quartet which echoes the 'rebirth' of the Fifth Symphony and was named 'spring-like' by Shostakovich. But as they progressed, and as Shostakovich began to believe that the critical ear of the 'Socialist Realism' enforcer might concentrate more on his public works than to private compositions, these quartets would increasing abandon the innocence of spring.